It is at this moment I am lucky, honor and advantage to spend my final oral competition. To start, I spent this afternoon philosophy. Ordinary matter, if not easy, it is because I have to do for three years. Only I forgot we do not ask me to make the ESC in philosophy but in the history of ideas. Therefore, after trying to show why he was in anthropology limit freedom of expression, I found myself having to venture into the land of the slippery history of ideas ... and frankly, honestly ... here.
What is most striking about this story is still that philosophy comes down to a list of books that should be read, not learning to think. If reading is essential, it is not the whole philosophy. And ask for the full list of treatises of Aristotle in order for an oral philosophy I find it absurd. Because it's not like the philo ... Ask the subject of a treaty, the answer to a problem posed by the author goes further, but a list of securities ...
It's boring because that in itself is an oral that would have been interesting if we had confined to the subject and the philosophy. But having to do with the history of ideas after three years of license (whereas they are only 15 hours of courses at semester 1 ° by 1 ° year) it's frustrating.
That said, wait and see, I still have to pass English, English and maintenance. All is not lost.
0 comments:
Post a Comment